“What do you call the curly symbol in the middle of an email address?” asked a slightly dishevelled Italian girl over breakfast in surprisingly crisp English.
It was a strange, almost nerdish opening query in the breakfast room of a cheap hotel and caught me a bit by surprise. Most breakfast conversation in these places tend to be about where you are from, where you have been or are travelling and questions to compare notes about what is worth visiting in the current town.
I responded that we call it “at”.
“I know that, everyone says that, but what is it really called”, she fired back disappointed at my meagre suggestion. She proudly stated “We call it chiocciola which is a snail in English."
I was simply lost for words. Chiocciola did seem a much more appealing choice. In a language as rich in words as English, which seems to have a word for every possible circumstance, why is there no real word for the “@” symbol, or am I simply to ignorant to be aware of it. At a nearby table, a Frenchman indicated that they sometimes use escargot in the same manner (though they also have a duller more typical term).
It started me into an embarrassing sequence of shameless nerdish breakfast queries over the following days to discover that most languages have far more flamboyant words for the innocent “@” symbol, which has become so prevalent in our life. After all, I wasn’t likely to meet any of these people again so the odd nerdy inquiry seemed pretty safe.
The answers provide a rich variety of visual descriptors. The Danes and Swedes favour snabela which translates as elephant trunk, while the Finns call it kissanhäntä or cat’s tail. Some Finns utilise the melodic miukumauku which is their description for the sound a cat makes. The neighbouring Russians use man’s best friend (sobaka) in their email addresses.
In the Netherlands, people use apestaartje or little monkey’s tail while the Germans (klammeraffe), the Serbs (majmun), the Bulgarians (majmunsko) and the Slovenes (afna) prefer the entire monkey.
In Hungary, the slightly less pleasant kukac (maggot) is favoured. Similarly, the Thais use their word for wiggling worm. In the Czech Republic (zavináč or rollmop herring) and Israel (shtrudel or strudel) food is the target of their description. Finally, the Filipinos go for utong or nipple.
I certainly don’t lose sleep over it but I do wonder why English didn’t manage a more elegant word for this modest but ubiquitous symbol of the electronic age.
Other Recent Musings
Lest We Forget!
Belgian Pride?
Generosity and Gemütlichkeit
Sunday, November 23, 2008
The Humble @
Labels:
random musings
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
I suppose it is a shame we don't have a cute word for @
However I can't really think of any times I'd ever need to use that word, which is maybe why none has ever developed.
Interesting question.... I think the snail-expressions is the best, better than our "snabel-a" we use in Sweden. Though we actually call the old original mails within corporations for "snail-mails" :-)
BTW: Thanks for stopping by, I was posting a new post about a trip right after you had visited...
hahaha! That's a funny one!
Hmm, how do I "draw" a snail using that @ sign now? =P
@itinerantlondoner: I guess that makes sense.
@lifecruiser: I like snail and monkey's tail too.
@eunice: I think snail is very descriptive.
Post a Comment